Tuesday, November 20, 2012

The Puck Stops Here: A Hockey Lit Survey by David Davis

IN THE WINTER OF 1955, the editors of a newly launched magazine called Sports Illustrated sent William Faulkner to watch an ice hockey game between the New York Rangers and the Montreal Canadiens. The novelist was a puck novice — the article was entitled "An Innocent at Rinkside" — and he knew little about the sport's strategy or culture. But his brief essay captured hockey's relentless tempo, its improvisational surges, its attendant carnage:


[The game] seemed discorded and inconsequent, bizarre and paradoxical like the frantic darting of the weightless bugs which run on the surface of stagnant pools. Then it would break, coalesce through a kind of kaleidoscopic whirl like a child's toy, into a pattern, a design almost beautiful, as if an inspired choreographer had drilled a willing and patient and hard-working troupe of dancers — a pattern, design which was trying to tell him something, say something to him urgent and important and true in that second before, already bulging with the motion and the speed, it began to disintegrate and dissolve.

Then he learned to find the puck and follow it. Then the individual players would emerge. They would not emerge like the sweating barehanded behemoths from the troglodyte mass of football, but instead as fluid and fast and effortless as rapier thrusts or lightning — [Maurice] Richard with something of the passionate glittering fatal alien quality of snakes, [Bernie] Geoffrion like an agile ruthless precocious boy who maybe couldn't do anything else but then he didn't need to; and others — the veteran [Edgar] Laprade, still with the know-how and the grace. But he had time too now, or rather time had him, and what remained was no longer expendable that recklessly, heedlessly, successfully; not enough of it left now to buy fresh passion and fresh triumph with.

Faulkner never again wrote about hockey. As far as we know, he never attended another NHL contest. Still, "Innocent at Rinkside" resonated because, for so long, the literature of hockey was "oddly limited," as George Plimpton put it, "odd because its world [...] is rife with storytellers and legend-keepers, and because hockey has a long and absorbing history."


This was true in Canada, where the rink is sacred ground, as well as America. Indeed, while the likes of Ring Lardner, Jack London, A.J. Liebling, P.G. Wodehouse, Norman Mailer, Fred Exley, Bernard Malamud, W.C. Heinz, John McPhee, Dan Jenkins, Donald Hall, Philip Roth, David Halberstam, Willie Morris, and Plimpton himself (among many others) were creating a small, vital, sports-lit cannon that revolved about baseball, boxing, football, basketball, horse racing, golf, and the Olympics, there was no must-read hockey novel, no classic memoir, no go-to oral history. Only in the works of Mordecai Richler could readers catch glimpses of the ice. (Hollywood made one contribution: Slap Shot (1977), with an uproarious screenplay written by Nancy Dowd based on her younger brother's minor-league hockey experiences. The next year, Dowd won the Academy Award for Coming Home.)

Perhaps this silence was caused by hockey's cult status. At the time of Faulkner's visit to Madison Square Garden, the National Hockey League had only six (count 'em — six!) franchises, all of them clustered in cold-weather climes: New York, Boston, Chicago, Detroit, Montreal, and Toronto. The players were almost exclusively Canadians, the sons of miners from far-flung places like Flin Flon, Manitoba, and Trail, British Columbia, who learned to skate (and brawl) on frozen-over rivers and backyard rinks. They played without helmets or masks; even the goalies stood against 100-mile-an-hour slapshots without any protection. Their faces were grooved with stitches. Salaries rarely topped $10,000.

This, of course, is now considered the NHL's Golden Age.

Beginning in the late 1960s, as college, professional, and Olympic sports transformed themselves into commercialized products for television, a series of radical changes jolted the NHL from insularity. In 1967, the league doubled in size to 12 teams, an expansion that pushed beyond the north-northeast region into lucrative, warm weather markets like Los Angeles.

Five years later, the NHL faced direct competition for the first time. An upstart rival, the World Hockey Association, outbid the NHL for superstar Bobby Hull and lured the immortal Gordie Howe from retirement. Eventually the WHA snatched up the rights to a teenage phenom named Wayne Gretzky, who would soon be the face of the sport. (The two leagues merged in 1979, bringing Gretzky into the NHL fold.) The search for talent expanded beyond North America, to Scandinavia and Eastern Europe.

In 1972, an all-star team of Canadian NHLers faced off against the national squad from the U.S.S.R. Every pundit from Vancouver to Newfoundland predicted that Team Canada would win what would eventually be known as the Summit Series. Instead, with methodical brilliance, the Russians out-played the Canadians and nearly pulled off an historic upset. Team Canada only escaped ignominious failure by scoring the winning goal in the waning seconds of the final game.

Hockey's tumult — rampant expansion, the influx of money and new talent, the near-surrender to (horrors!) the Russians, and more — roiled traditionalists. It also seemed to provide succor for writers, as if they needed to experience hockey's profound changes to find sources of inspiration.

The first such work to break through, interestingly enough, was a children's story entitled The Hockey Sweater (Le Chandail de Hockey in the original French) in 1979. Author Roch Carrier begins by recounting the glorious youth he spent in small-town Quebec during the 1940s, when he and his buddies played hockey outdoors throughout the shortened winter days. They rooted for the Montreal Canadiens, all of them proudly encased in the team's bleu, blanc et rouge-colored sweaters ("sweater" means "jersey" in hockey lingo), and they worshipped Maurice "The Rocket" Richard, the same Richard referenced by Faulkner, going so far as to comb their hair like their hero.

Having outgrown his holey sweater, Carrier's mother decides to order him a new one from a mail-order catalog. What they receive, to Carrier's horror, is a blue-and-white jersey of the Toronto Maple Leafs, the hated rivals of Les Habitants. Carrier's mother refuses to return the sweater, forcing Carrier to wear Toronto's colors. He is mortified and summarily shunned. The story ends with Carrier, in church, praying for "a hundred million moths" to eat up the despised jersey.

Hockey Sweater is a deceptively simple parable that manages to encapsulate the country's French-English cultural divide even as it hearkens to a halcyon era, when hockey equaled innocent fun and Canada reigned as hockey's unquestioned champion. The popularity of Carrier's delightful story has not waned. It's since been turned into a symphony and an animated short film; a line, in English and French, was used on the back of a $5 (Canadian) bill.

Soon afterwards came two season-in-the-life books: radio host and essayist Peter Gzowski's The Game of Our Lives, which followed the Edmonton Oilers throughout the 1980-81 season as a stick-wielding magician named Wayne Gretzky began his ascent to legend-hood. Then, goaltender Ken Dryden scored with The Game (1983), Dryden, it must be said, was not your usual jock. He starred at Cornell University before playing goalie for the Montreal Canadiens. He led the team to four Stanley Cup victories even as he studied (and took a one-year hiatus from his career) to become a lawyer.

The Game chronicles Dryden's final year in the NHL (1978-79). It's a probing examination of a sport, a team and an existence — not excluding the desultory practices, the intimate banter of the locker-room, the pulse-racing anticipation of the playoffs. The majority of his time is spent waiting: for the next game, the next airplane, the next shot.

Here, Dryden recounts a goalie's chores:

Playing goal is not fun. Behind a mask, there are no smiling faces, no sweaty grins of satisfaction. It is a grim, humorless position, largely uncreative, requiring little physical movement, giving little physical pleasure in return. A goalie is simply there, tied to a net and to a game; the game acts, a goalie reacts. How he reacts, how often, a hundred shots or no shots, is not up to him. Unable to initiate a game's action, unable to focus its direction, he can only do what he must do. It is his job, a job that cannot be done one minute in every three, one that will not await rare moments of genius, one that ends when the game ends, and only then. For while a goal goes up in lights, a permanent record for the goal-scorer and the game, a save is ephemeral, important at the time, occasionally when a game is over, but able to be wiped away, undone, with the next shot.

Many experts, most prominently Grantland.com's Bill Simmons, believe that The Game is the best hockey book ever published. George Plimpton agreed, calling it "a classic." Plimpton himself donned goalie pads for the Boston Bruins in Open Net (1985), another of his Walter Mitty-esque tales, wherein the Ivy League amateur-enthusiast infiltrates the locker-room, bonds with the beer-swilling jocks, and briefly joins the fray.

This wasn't Plimpton's finest effort — Paper Lion and Out of My League top that list — but his conversations with roommate Jim "Seaweed" Pettie and Bruins coach Don "Grapes" Cherry (now a famous, bombastic hockey analyst) are insightful gems. Here, Plimpton riffs on creating a design for his goalie mask: "I drew them clumsily on telephone pads. Some were quirky — a chipmunk's face with small, apple cheeks, perky and with a prominent pair of long teeth showing in the middle of a sunny smile, bright blue eyes sparkling above; some were meant to puzzle, such as one I designed that was decorated with a large question mark; others were graphic — a mask that read simply enough in red letters, NO!; yet another was a psychedelic swirl that was supposed to make anyone who gazed on it slightly dizzy."

Two years later, the late author-musician Paul Quarrington delivered what many consider to be hockey's finest novel: King Leary. Based in part on the life and career of King Clancy, a pint-sized defenseman who played for the Toronto Maple Leafs in the 1930s, the aged fictional character lives in a retirement home and spends much of his time reminiscing about former line-mates, lovers, and rivals.

King Leary is a valentine — a maple leaf? — to the pioneering era of professional hockey, and Quarrington evokes some of the arcane wonderment found in the books of fellow Canadian W.P. Kinsella, author of several baseball-themed novels, including Shoeless Joe. In this passage, Leary tries to recall his initial encounter with the sport: "I can't remember lacing on blades for the first time. Likewise with hockey. I've got no idea when I first heard of, saw, or played the game of hockey [...] [T]he truth of the matter is, I never knew that hockey originated. I figured it was just always there, like the moon.”

The same year, journalist Roy MacGregor published The Last Season, a dark novel that traces the rise and demise of tough-guy Felix Batterinski. His "position" is enforcer: he intentionally gets into fights to intimidate opponents, protect his teammates, and provide excitement for the fans. He's a not-too-bright palooka whose fists serve as both weapon and money-maker: "When I touched [my knuckles], they stung with his jaw, just as I knew when he moved this week he would feel me and I would be with him, his better, for weeks to follow. He had my mark on him. I too had swelling and redness but on the knuckles it shone with pride."

One novel from America was published during this era: Amazons: An Intimate Memoir by the First Woman Ever to Play in the National Hockey League (1980), attributed to one Cleo Birdwell. This oddity features the on- and off-the-ice hijinks of the first woman to play for New York Rangers, a leggy temptress who jumps into bed with many of the book's characters, "my honey blonde hair flying in the breeze, my silver skate blades flashing, my milky blue eyes, my taut ass and firm breasts, the downy white bruises on my milky white thighs."

This satire-gone-awry is long out of print. It's a well-known secret that Don DeLillo is the author (or, at least, co-author) of Amazons, although he refuses to acknowledge it.

¤

Since the mid-1980s, as if to make up for years of virtual silence, a torrent of hockey titles has been published, primarily in Canada, including biographies, histories, memoirs, novels and poetry. An (admittedly) cursory recap of the highlights: Journalist Jack Falla contributed Home Ice and Open Ice, which brought together his soulful essays and columns about the game's indelible pull. Writer-musician Dave Bidini turned himself into a nomad and, in Tropic of Hockey, sought out the game in remote locations, including Dubai, northern China, and Transylvania. Dryden and MacGregor teamed to explicate hockey's meaning in Home Game: Hockey and Life in Canada, which introduced themes that were echoed in How Hockey Explains Canada, by former Toronto Maple Leafs forward Paul Henderson and Jim Prime. Memoirs abound, from Theo Fleury's searing Playing With Fire to Herb Carnegie's stoic A Fly in a Pail of Milk to Ken Baker's breezy They Play Hockey in Heaven. Countless writers (including Bidini) re-visited the Canada-U.S.S.R. Summit Series, while journalist Wayne Coffey deftly recounted the 1980 U.S. Olympic team's gold-medal triumph over the Russians (the so-called "Miracle on Ice").

Several works probed hockey's dark side. From the late 1960s through the early 1990s, agent Alan Eagleson was hockey's most powerful figure. He controlled the players' union and was a major force within the international game. Unbeknownst to the players he was supposedly representing, he cut backroom deals that benefited the owners and himself. In Game Misconduct: Alan Eagleson and the Corruption of Hockey, reporter Russ Conway masterfully detailed the alleged crimes and misdemeanors. His sobering takedown ruined Eagleson; not long after its publication, his place in the Hockey Hall of Fame was revoked.

Meanwhile, long before charges of rape and sexual abuse were revealed at Penn State, former NHL player Sheldon Kennedy accused his junior coach of sexually assaulting him for years. That's one of many disturbing incidents related in Laura Robinson's Crossing the Line: Violence and Sexual Assault in Canada's National Sport, which argues persuasively that the pressure to make it to the NHL fosters a machismo that undermines the sport's moral center. Notes Robinson: "How can the game that defines Canada, that unifies the country in so many ways, that feeds young dreams or merely entertains in the darkest of winter days, also be responsible for the systematic dehumanization of young men and young women?"

In defining hockey as "that combination of ballet and murder," poet Al Purdy juxtaposed the artistry and brutality of the sport. Another poet, Randall Maggs, crafted Night Work: The Sawchuk Poems (2008), a harrowing epic about the troubled life of goalkeeper Terry Sawchuk. His brilliant career spanned 21 years and four Stanley Cup victories, but he also drank too much and suffered from depression. (If he were playing today, he would be examined for concussions.) He died from internal injuries after a "horseplaying" incident with a teammate.

Writes Maggs:

Who starts the brain's conspiracies?
Who knows what it is that waits in the trees?
Crazy.

¤

Sawchuk, it should be noted, played for the Los Angeles Kings during the team's inaugural season (1967-68). Before then, Southern California's contribution to hockey revolved around the city of Paramount, in south L.A., where Frank Zamboni invented and manufactured the ice-resurfacing machines that still bear his name.

The Kings' first owner, media magnate Jack Kent Cooke, was originally from Canada. He also owned the Lakers. He built the Fabulous Forum in Inglewood for his two clubs, figuring that, at the very least, the Kings would sell some tickets on nights when the Lakers were out of town.

Far from hockey's roots, clad in garish purple-and-gold uniforms, the Kings labored in obscurity. Even Felix Batterinski, the fictional enforcer from MacGregor's Last Season, recognized the Kings' sorry status:

Hockey meant nothing to L.A. Not only were the Kings nobodies up against the Lakers and the Dodgers and the Rams, but who could possibly compete for notice with The Fonz and Suzanne Sommers and Charlie's Angels and, more precious yet, the true Hollywood stars. The Los Angeles Kings made as much sense as turning the Queen Mary into a hotel. We were the London bridge in Arizona; the magic mountain in Disneyland was more real than a bunch of half-talented Canadians charging around on ice after a forty-five-cent piece of black rubber in a replica of the Forum in Rome, all for a mere $12.50 a seat. They even sold margaritas and tacos in the tuck shop at the Fabulous Forum. No fat men in runny noses peering knowingly through the steam of their Styrofoam cups; in California there might be foam cups and heat but it began with cleavage and ended with skintight acrylic pants.

L.A.'s image as a hockey Babylon changed in 1988, when then-owner Bruce McNall acquired Wayne Gretzky from the Edmonton Oilers. The "Great One" was the game's unquestioned best player, in the tradition of Richard, Howe and Bobby Orr. His presence instantaneously legitimized the NHL in Southern California.

Roy Orbison sang the National Anthem at Gretzky's L.A. debut. Ex-pat celebs like John Candy and Michael J. Fox flocked to the Forum. The team traded in their Mardi Gras- colored jerseys for the street-cred cool of black and silver. Gretzky's pull was so strong that he helped bring another NHL team, the Ducks, to Anaheim.

In his terrific book Gretzky's Tears: Hockey, America, and the Day That Changed Everything, journalist Stephen Brunt recounts the circumstances surrounding the historic trade. Losing its treasured natural resource, he writes, devastated Canada: "Sell them our water and our oil and our trees, sell them our fish and our wheat, gradually erase the great unguarded border, gradually break down the real and imagined differences. But sell the greatest hockey player in the world, sell Jesus of Brantford, and it cut to the heart, to the core, to the essence of belief."

Brunt notes that Canada soon got its revenge. Gretzky was unable to win the Stanley Cup with the Kings and eventually left. McNall pleaded guilty to fraud and went to prison. The team was sold, then sold again. Hockey again became irrelevant in L.A., even after the Kings moved into the glitzy downtown Staples Center.

Until last season, that is. After 45 years of futility, the Kings coalesced around an outstanding goalie and went on an improbable playoff run that resulted in their first-ever Stanley Cup. The Kings finally eclipsed the Lakers, the Clippers, the Dodgers and the Angels.

Who knows: perhaps the Kings' victory will inspire a young writer to create the Great American Hockey Novel. At the very least, it may well encourage local kids to take to the ice. As William Faulkner wrote in 1955, after the Rangers-Canadiens game: "We like the adrenalic discharge of vicarious excitement or triumph or success. But we like to do also: the discharge of the personal excitement of the triumph and the fear to be had from actually setting the horse at the stone wall or pointing the overcanvased sloop or finding by actual test if you can line up two sights and one buffalo in time. There must have been little boys in that throng too, frantic with the slow excruciating passage of time, panting for the hour when they would be Richard or Geoffrion or Laprade — the same little Negro boys whom the innocent has seen shadow-boxing in front of a photograph of Joe Louis in his own Mississippi town, the same little Norwegian boys he watched staring up the snowless slope of the Holmenkollen jump one July day in the hills above Oslo."

from: LA Times

Monday, November 19, 2012

New Findings Reaffirm Library Borrowers Are Also Buyers

Survey of 75,000 patrons shows library e-book patrons purchase average of 3.2 books per month


(Cleveland, OH) - November 15, 2012 - An extensive online poll of library e-book readers finds that these patrons purchase an average of 3.2 books (both print and e-books) each month, and a majority would consider purchasing books discovered on a library website. These e-book borrowers also report that their digital content purchases have increased in the past six months. Sponsored by OverDrive with the American Library Association's Office for Information Technology Policy (OITP), the survey constitutes the largest study of library eBook usage to date, with more than 75,000 people responding.

Confirming earlier studies such as the Pew Internet Project's "Libraries, Patrons, and E-books," the survey found that a significant percentage of library users regularly purchase books they first discover at the library. In fact, 57 percent of those surveyed said that the public library is their primary source of book discovery.

Library e-book borrower: Highlights

· Public library is primary source of book discovery (57%)
· Purchase average of 3.2 books per month (including print and e-books)
· Would consider purchasing books discovered on library website (53%)
· Visit both the physical library and download e-books (53%)
· Digital book purchases have increased in past six months (44%)
· Purchased book (print or e-book) after borrowing that title (35%)


Library e-book borrower: Demographics
· Female (78%)
· Adults aged 40-64 (55%)
· Household income $75,000+ (48%)
· College degree or higher (74%)

"Book discovery and promotion have taken on greater importance for publishers and authors as the shift to digital continues, and this survey confirms the value of public libraries," said David Burleigh, OverDrive director of marketing. "With rising web traffic and enhancements to library websites (see YouTube preview), public libraries are becoming an essential part of the marketing strategy for publishers."

"Library lending encourages people to experiment with new authors, topics and genres—which is good for the entire reading and publishing ecosystem," said Carrie Russell, OITP program director.

The survey also found that dedicated e-book reading devices—including Kindle, Sony Reader and Nook—were the devices most used to read e-books from the library (84 percent). Desktop or laptop PCs (20 percent), smartphones (19 percent) and tablets (18 percent) rounded out the top four types, which reflects the rapidly escalating trend of borrowing on mobile devices recently reported by OverDrive.(In August, mobile devices accounted for 30 percent of checkouts and 34 percent of web traffic at OverDrive-powered library websites. Both statistics are up nearly 100 percent year over year.)

The survey took place between June 13 and July 31, 2012, at thousands of OverDrive-powered public library websites in the United States, with 75,384 respondents completing all or part of the survey. The intent of the survey was to gain insight into the borrowing and buying behaviors of library e-book readers and is not representative of the U.S. population as a whole. To see the full survey data, please visit OverDrive's Digital Library Blog.

With more than two-thirds of U.S. public libraries participating in OverDrive e-book lending, 87 percent of the U.S. population has access to e-books and audiobooks through this service. Worldwide, readers checked out more than 34 million e-books and audiobooks with OverDrive in the first half of 2012—more than double the checkouts in all of 2011. To find a library with OverDrive e-books near you, visit search.overdrive.com.

from: OverDrive

Friday, November 16, 2012

Thomas Hardy and George Eliot fall out of fashion

Works by Thomas Hardy, George Eliot and EM Forster have fallen in popularity over the last two decades, according to new research of the literary canon.

by: Jasper Copping

They are the books that have stood the test of time – not to mention the ones we are all supposed to have read.


But an analysis of reading habits has revealed that some of the most celebrated classics of English literature have fallen out of fashion in recent years.

Works by Thomas Hardy, George Eliot and EM Forster have seen their popularity plummet over the last two decades, while those by Charles Dickens, Jane Austen and George Orwell have fared much better.

The study involves a comparison of lending data from Britain's libraries for 50 classics by British and Irish authors from the literary canon from the early 1990s, a decade ago, and last year.

It shows some clear winners and losers, with all featured works by the first three named authors rising in the list over the period and all of those by other three falling.

Academics say the changes could show readers' growing taste for more upbeat, comic novels with happy endings over more tragic, harrowing works.


Another likely factor behind the popularity of works appears to be whether or not they have featured in a television or film adaptation.

The biggest riser in the chart is Cranford, by Elizabeth Gaskell, which has risen from 49th place in the early nineties, and 44th a decade ago, to reach 16th. The novel, was made into a BBC series five years ago.

All the Dickens and Austen novels featured in the study have also been dramatised at least once during the period: Great Expectations (adapted for the screen in 1998 and 1999), David Copperfield (1999 and 2000), and Oliver Twist (1997, 1999, 2005 and 2007); Pride and Prejudice (1995 and 2005), Sense and Sensibility (1995 and 2008), Northanger Abbey (2007), and Emma (1996).

Notable risers included: Gulliver's Travels, by Jonathan Swift (40 to 23); Cold Comfort Farm, by Stella Gibbons (43 to 24); The Woman in White (31 to 18), and The Moonstone (38 to 26), both by Wilkie Collins; The War of the Worlds, by HG Wells (45 to 32); and Robinson Crusoe, by Daniel Defoe (41 to 33).

The work to see the biggest fall in popularity is the Jungle Book, which has sunk from third place in the 1990s to 36th. Its author, Rudyard Kipling is now considered unfashionable by many for his views on the Empire.

The new study has been conducted by the Public Lending Right, which monitors data from libraries and collects payments for authors. In the case of the classics' authors, it does not collect any money.

It compiled a list of 50 classics written before 1950 and then analysed the lending data for three years: 1993-94 and 2010-11 – the earliest and latest years for which records are available – and also 2001-02.

In total, the 50 books were lent 641,733 times in the most recent year available, compared with 1,170,303 at the start of the period. This mirrors a general trend in libraries, which have seen loans fall during the period from 552 million to 300 million.

Jim Parker, registrar of the PLR said: "This is the first time we have analysed classics in this way. They are a niche part of library loans but they are still being borrowed.

"We know that television dramatisations do have an impact. Often, they lead people to look out for other books by the same authors. But who knows what else could be behind the changes."

John Bowen, a professor of nineteenth century literature at the University of York, said the success of authors like Dickens and Austen at the expense of others, like Hardy and Eliot, could be down to readers seeking comfort in their greater optimism and happy endings.

"What is rather cheering is that the more optimistic and comic novels, with happy endings – like those by Dickens and Austen – seem to have done better," he said. Hardy and Eliot are much less simply positive or comic in their conclusions. It could be the sense of overcoming difficulty that has appealed."

The top 20
1 (7 in 1993-94) – Pride and Prejudice, Jane Austen, 32,812 loans in 2010-11
2 (2) – Wuthering Heights, Emily Bronte, 29,278
3 (1) – The Hobbit, JRR Tolkien, 28,414
4 (11) – Nineteen Eighty-Four, George Orwell, 24,839
5 (4) – Jane Eyre, Charlotte Bronte, 23,985
6 (9) – Animal Farm, George Orwell, 22,396
7 (22) – Great Expectations, Charles Dickens, 21,308
8 (10) – Emma, Jane Austen, 21,066
9 (5) – Dracula, Bram Stoker, 19,046
10 (12) – Lord of the Flies, William Golding, 18,404
11 (16) – Sense and Sensibility, Jane Austen, 18,360
12 (6) – Rebecca, Daphne du Maurier, 18,310
13 (34) – Oliver Twist, Charles Dickens, 17,876
14 (18) – Treasure Island, Robert Louis Stephenson, 17,463
15 (35) – Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde, Robert Louis Stephenson, 15,591
16 (49) – Cranford, Elizabeth Gaskell, 15,337
17 (20) – Northanger Abbey, Jane Austen, 14,716
18 (31) – The Woman in White, Wilkie Collins, 14,596
19 (8) – Tess of the d'Urbervilles, Thomas Hardy, 13,593
20 (28) – Brideshead Revisited, Evelyn Waugh, 12,969

from: Telegraph

Thursday, November 15, 2012

Helen Fielding to write new Bridget Jones novel

Bridget Jones's Diary, the book that launched a thousand chick-lit imitators, will be brought back for a third time.

by: Felicity Capon

Bridget Jones and her haphazard love life are making a return to our bookshelves, 17 years after first being published. Helen Fielding’s new work has been acquired by publisher Jonathan Cape and the novel is due to be published in Autumn 2013.


No title has yet been released for the new novel, although it is reported to be set in contemporary London and will explore “a different phase in Bridget’s life”.

Dan Franklin, a publisher at Jonathan Cape, said: "Great comic writers are as rare as hen’s teeth. Helen is one of a very select band who have created a character, Bridget, of whom the very thought makes you smile. Like millions of others, I can’t wait to see what’s happened to her."

The first two Bridget Jones novels, Bridget Jones’s Diary, published in 1996 and The Edge of Reason, published in 1999, were international bestsellers. They have been published in over 40 countries and together have sold over 15 million copies worldwide, with help from two successful film adaptations, released in 2002 and 2004.

Earlier this year Fielding told the Telegraph she would not be attempting any 50 Shades of Grey style sex scenes. “If ever I wrote a sex scene, I would send it to friends for feedback – different passages to different friends – and, honestly, I’d never hear the end of it,” she said. “I would always be hearing little references to it slipped into conversation – how embarrassing – so now I just don’t do it.”

from: Telegraph

Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Amazon finds its books aren’t welcome at many bookstores

by: Nora Krug

“Care of Wooden Floors,” by Will Wiles, is the kind of novel you’d expect to see on a “staff picks” shelf at an independent bookstore. A slim but sophisticated farce by a relatively unknown author, the book is full of witty asides and snappy comments about modern life; its wry, endearingly hapless narrator feels like he might have stepped out of a Nick Hornby story.


But many local stores, both independents and chains, are refusing to stock it. They don’t want to promote what they see as a predatory publisher. “Care of Wooden Floors” was issued this month by New Harvest, a new collaboration between Houghton Mifflin Harcourt and the arch-nemesis of brick-and-mortar bookstores: Amazon.

Earlier this year the two companies signed a licensing agreement whereby Amazon Publishing acquires, edits, markets and publicizes books that are then distributed by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt’s sales force, according to Alexandra Woodworth, a publicist for Amazon/New Harvest. The partnership was an effort to woo bookstores into stocking Amazon-published books. But many booksellers are balking.


“We don’t want to do anything that will support their publishing venture,” said Mark LaFramboise, chief buyer for Politics & Prosein Washington. The bookstore is not stocking Wiles’s novel, though it will order the book upon customer request.

“Amazon has not been a very cooperative fellow bookseller in any fashion,” LaFramboise said. “They pretty much want nothing more than our demise.”

Busboys and Poets is not carrying Wiles’s novel, either. “We are certainly not trying to be a satellite showroom for Amazon,” owner Andy Shallal said. “We don’t support Amazon’s ‘Wal-Martization’ of bookstores.” (Busboys’s Web site takes that position even further, saying Amazon “has strong-armed many publishers into reducing the prices of their books and eBooks.”) Busboys will not special-order the book but will direct interested customers to the Amazon site.

It’s not just the independents that are protesting. Barnes & Noble also has decided not to stock New Harvest books in its 689 stores. It will, however, sell them on its Web site and special-order them for customers. “Our decision is based on Amazon’s continued push for exclusivity with publishers, agents and the authors they represent,” Jaime Carey, B&N’s chief merchandising officer, said in a statement in January.

Woodworth would not disclose how many copies of “Care of Wooden Floors” were being printed or had sold since its release Oct. 9. “We’re excited about the reaction so far,” she said. Features about the book have been aired on NPR and appeared in the New York Times, where a full-page ad for the book ran in the Book Review earlier this month.

Wiles’s novel was originally published in Britain by Fourth Estate and received generally positive reviews there. Amazon will not provide sales figures for the book, which was ranked 40,588 on its U.S. site as of Tuesday. According to Nielsen BookScan, fewer than 1,000 copies of the book had been sold as of last week. “My Mother Was Nuts,” Penny Marshall’s memoir, which New Harvest published Sept. 18, sold just 7,000 copies in its first month, despite a reported $800,000 advance; Jessica Valenti’s “Why Have Kids?,” released by New Harvest on Sept. 4, has sold 1,000.

Without prominent display in bookstores, “authors are not going to get the kind of exposure they want,” said Becky Anderson, president of the American Booksellers Association, a trade organization for independent booksellers. “If I were an author, I would think twice” about signing on with Amazon.

Then again, if enough bookstores refuse to sell Amazon’s books, they could become just the kind of hard-to-get, underappreciated gems that independent bookstores typically champion.

from: Washington Post

Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Boulder libraries to allow permit holders to carry guns

by: Joe Rubino

A rule change that will allow concealed-weapon permit holders to bring their guns into Boulder's public libraries received unanimous approval from the city's library commission Wednesday night.


The Boulder Public Library Commission discussed a new set of rules of conduct last month but heard several questions about rule No. 5, banning weapons inside library facilities.

Assistant City Attorney Sandra Llanes then took another look at the rules, according to commission documents.

Citing the state's concealed weapons statute and a Colorado Supreme Court ruling earlier this year that dictated the University of Colorado could not ban concealed-weapon permit holders from bringing guns on campus, Llanes proposed the rule change approved Wednesday.

"Given that this is state law, a change is in order," Commissioner Anne Sawyer said Wednesday. "We have to conform to state law."

The measure did not draw any public comments at Wednesday's meeting.

The policy formerly read, "No person may bring a weapon into or possess a weapon in any library facility except this rule shall not apply to library security personnel or police officers carrying service weapons."

The updated rule will read, "No person may bring or possess a weapon, except as expressly permitted by state law."

The new policy and other rule changes approved by the commission will not take effect until they are signed by City Manager Jane Brautigam.

from: Daily Camera

Monday, November 12, 2012

The 13 Worst Reviews of Classic Books

A quarter century ago, Pushcart editor Bill Henderson put together Rotten Reviews Redux, a collection of the meanest and most scathing reviews of classic books and the writers who penned them. The vitriol returns in a 2012 edition of the book with a new introduction from Henderson. We sorted through the book to find 13 of our favorites.

by: Bill Henderson

"The final blow-up of what was once a remarkable, if minor, talent." -The New Yorker, 1936, on Absalom, Absalom! by William Faulkner
"Whitman is as unacquainted with art as a hog is with mathematics." -The London Critic, 1855, on Leaves of Grass by Walt Whitman
"That this book is strong and that Miss Chopin has a keen knowledge of certain phrases of the feminine will not be denied. But it was not necessary for a writer of so great refinement and poetic grace to enter the overworked field of sex fiction." -Chicago Times Herald, 1899, on The Awakening by Kate Chopin

"What has never been alive cannot very well go on living. So this is a book of the season only..." -New York Herald Tribune, 1925, on The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald
"Here all the faults of Jane Eyre (by Charlotte Brontë) are magnified a thousand fold, and the only consolation which we have in reflecting upon it is that it will never be generally read." -James Lorimer, North British Review, 1847, on Wuthering Heights by Emily Brontë

"That a book like this could be written--published here--sold, presumably over the counters, leaves one questioning the ethical and moral standards...there is a place for the exploration of abnormalities that does not lie in the public domain. Any librarian surely will question this for anything but the closed shelves. Any bookseller should be very sure that he knows in advance that he is selling very literate pornography." -Kirkus Reviews, 1958, on Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov

"Her work is poetry; it must be judged as poetry, and all the weaknesses of poetry are inherent in it." -New York Evening Post, 1927, on To the Lighthouse by Virginia Woolf

"An oxymoronic combination of the tough and tender, Of Mice and Men will appeal to sentimental cynics, cynical sentimentalists...Readers less easily thrown off their trolley will still prefer Hans Andersen." -Time, 1937, on Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck

"Its ethics are frankly pagan." -The Independent, 1935, on Of Human Bondage by W. Somerset Maugham

"A gloomy tale. The author tries to lighten it with humor, but unfortunately her idea of humor is almost exclusively variations on the pratfall...Neither satire nor humor is achieved." -Saturday Review of Literature, 1952, on Wise Blood by Flannery O'Connor

"Middlemarch is a treasure-house of details, but it is an indifferent whole." -Henry James, Galaxy, 1872, on Middlemarch by George Eliot

"At a conservative estimate, one million dollars will be spent by American readers for this book. They will get for their money 34 pages of permanent value. These 34 pages tell of a massacre happening in a little Spanish town in the early days of the Civil War...Mr. Hemingway: please publish the massacre scene separately, and then forget For Whom the Bell Tolls; please leave stories of the Spanish Civil War to Malraux..." -Commonweal, 1940, on For Whom the Bell Tolls by Ernest Hemingway

"Monsieur Flaubert is not a writer." -Le Figaro, 1857, on Madame Bovary by Gustave Flaubert

from: Publisher's Weekly