Readers and publishers engage in new medium for debate.
Twitter is not to everyone's taste – it's no secret that many readersof this blog suspect that the Guardian gives the microblogging servicefar more attention than it deserves and might agree with OylMiller's stream of consciousness piece in McSweeney's this week thatbegins: "I saw the best minds of my generation destroyed by brevity,over-connectedness, emotionally starving for attention."
But … yes, of course there's a but, the current Twitter conversationbetween publishers and readers, writers and booksellers is worth a look.
Gathered under the hashtag "dearpublisher" (hashtags are how Twitterusers group topics to make it easy to find all the tweets on onesubject – just put dearpublisher in the search box and all tweets thatinclude the phrase #dearpublisher will show up on one page) arequestions and comments that are starting up a direct debate betweenpublishers and readers.
The publishers say they are listening:
SceptreBooks: If anyone's got a specific question ask away – and will join in the conversation when I can add something to it.
HodderBooks: Just so you all know, we're listening if you've got something to say!
WalkerBooksUK: Just came back after meetings to discover #dearpublisher. Keep them coming – we love all feedback!
PanMacmillanAus: Reading the #dearpublisher chat – keep them coming,
people, we're listening!
And readers are making their views known. OK, so there's only so muchyou can say in 140 characters – it's not the place to go into thecomplexities of e-book pricing and DRM – but readers are makingsuccinct and forceful points and the initiative is encouraging debateabout all areas of publishing.
Vampire-fatigue is coming across strongly:
Maria_Disidoro: Telling me something is "the next Twilight" guaranteesI will never pick it up.
BloomsburyBell: Please, no more vampires
Well, mostly:
tehawesomersace: People of color don't all live in the ghetto or have abusive parents or wish they were white. Why can't we be vampires?
Other comments range from content to marketing:
StuartEvers: #dearpublishers remember: the book that became a success wasn't always an obvious bestseller in the first place ...
MarilynFactor: being black can be fun not in a we make the best out of the worst kind of way and does not have to involve an identity crisis
SekritEmuSister: That book you feel is a risk in the market that's too edgy and provocative? I'll read it. So will all my friends.
RyanMCFC: don't allow poor scans of your picture books to be used on Google Books. As an illustrator that would drive me nuts.
Empireofbooks: It's okay to have quotes on the back and inside, but please not on the cover. It spoils amazing artwork.
The publishers have started responding as well as listening and thedebate is hotting up:
Vintagebooks: Just to add to the #dearpublisher debate - often we do publish amazing/translated/odd/bizarre books (like you want!) and no one buys them!
Whatever you think of Twitter, I'm not sure that this kind of openforum dialogue would have been possible on any other platform and,personally, I think more direct interaction between readers andpublishers is an overdue and welcome development. Do you think it'sprogress or a superficial gesture? And, if you're not a twitterer,what would your short message to a publisher be?
From: Guardian
No comments:
Post a Comment